{"id":215,"date":"2008-04-08T09:18:28","date_gmt":"2008-04-08T13:18:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.shieldsgroup.com\/?p=215"},"modified":"2008-04-08T14:44:01","modified_gmt":"2008-04-08T18:44:01","slug":"e-85-fuel-and-simple-mathematics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/08\/e-85-fuel-and-simple-mathematics\/","title":{"rendered":"E-85 Fuel and Simple Mathematics&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Today I watched a video on the WTAJ TV-10 News website concerning the availability of E-85 in State College, PA.  The video is <a title=\"WTAJ TV-10 Video on E-85 in State College, PA\" href=\"http:\/\/wearecentralpa.com\/media_player.php?media_id=13419\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>It looks really good &#8212; like it&#8217;s a good thing to go buy a <a title=\"Wikipedia entry on flexible-fuel vehicles\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flexible-fuel_vehicle\" target=\"_blank\">flexible-fuel vehicle<\/a> and save some cash at the pump at the same time.  But is it? Let&#8217;s do some math.<\/p>\n<p>A gallon of regular fuel at the station is $3.35.  E-85 is $2.99. That&#8217;s a savings of 11% at the pump. But everyone agrees that E-85 is not as efficient as gasoline.  The good people at WTAJ note that when they say, &#8220;&#8230;vehicles using the special fuel will get poorer gas mileage.&#8221;  How much poorer?<\/p>\n<p>Wikipedia notes that a <a title=\"Wikipedia entry on E-85\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/E85\" target=\"_self\">Fuel-flex Chevy Tahoe averaging 18 MPG on gasoline will average 13 MPG<\/a> on E-85.  That&#8217;s a decrease in efficiency of 28%.  So let&#8217;s imagine that we put 1,000 miles on our Fuel-Flex Tahoe.  Here&#8217;s what the math says:<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" frame=\"void\" rules=\"none\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"86\"><\/col>\n<col width=\"86\"><\/col>\n<col width=\"86\"><\/col>\n<col width=\"86\"><\/col>\n<col width=\"86\"><\/col>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"86\" height=\"16\" align=\"left\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"86\" align=\"center\">Fuel Cost<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\" align=\"center\">MPG<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\" align=\"center\">Miles Driven<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\" align=\"center\">Total Spent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"16\" align=\"center\">Gasoline<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">$3.35<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">18<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">1000<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">$58.91<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"16\" align=\"center\">E-85<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">$2.99<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">13<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">1000<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">$79.91<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>In this scenario, using E-85 instead of gasoline will actually cost an additional $21 per thousand miles driven.  That may be good for the environment, but until the price is closer to 30% less than gasoline it&#8217;s not a financial advantage to the consumer.<\/p>\n<p>So buy it if you want to reduce your petroleum consumption and emissions, but don&#8217;t fool yourself that you&#8217;re saving money.  <a title=\"Kermit the Frog singing \" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=hpiIWMWWVco\" target=\"_blank\">Kermit was right<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today I watched a video on the WTAJ TV-10 News website concerning the availability of E-85 in State College, PA. It looks really good &#8212; like it&#8217;s a good thing to go buy a flexible-fuel vehicle and save some cash at the pump at the same time. But is it? Let&#8217;s do some math. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/08\/e-85-fuel-and-simple-mathematics\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[8],"tags":[33,32],"class_list":["post-215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-misc","tag-economics","tag-environment"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9XvmV-3t","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shieldsgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}